Prepared for lenders, CDCs, and federal agencies to SBA SOP 50 10 8, USDA RD Instruction 5001, and conventional underwriting standards. Fiduciary duty runs to the lender and the agency, never the borrower. More than 4,000 studies since 1998 covering $40.2 billion in evaluated project value.
Tribal projects carry a layer of analysis no other category requires: sovereign legal structure, trust versus fee land status and its collateral consequences, Section 17 corporation governance, and the tax position that sovereign status confers. The feasibility study addresses the leasehold-mortgage structure available under 25 USC §415 where land is in trust, embeds applicable sovereign tax exemptions in the operating model where they are real, and presents the lender a credit analysis that is honest about both the advantages and the structural conditions precedent.
A tribal enterprise chartered as a Section 17 corporation under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 carries a tax position no taxable competitor can replicate: permanent exemption from federal corporate income tax, state income tax, state modified business tax on wages, property tax on trust-land improvements, and state commerce tax on gross receipts — and, where a tribal–state fuel compact provides it, exemption from state fuel excise tax. This is not a negotiated abatement with a sunset date or a discretionary incentive a legislature can revoke. It is a structural feature of federal Indian law rooted in inherent tribal sovereignty, recognized in the Commerce Clause, upheld since Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), and codified in the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975.
The discipline is in how the study presents it. Wert-Berater carries only the certain exemptions in the base case; compact-dependent items such as state fuel excise are modeled strictly as upside sensitivity, never as base-case revenue. And the firm's tribal studies include a taxable-parity test: the same project is re-run as if operated by a hypothetical taxable entity at the same site, so the lender can see whether the project stands on its own economics before any sovereign advantage is counted. A feasibility determination that survives the fully-taxable case treats the tax position as what it is — a permanent credit enhancement and margin of safety above an already-feasible base, not a crutch the deal depends on.
Trust versus fee status determines the collateral structure, and the study addresses it before reviewing counsel has to ask. Where land is held in federal trust, a conventional mortgage on the fee is unavailable; the financeable interest is a leasehold mortgage on a long-term lease approved under 25 U.S.C. §415, and the study documents that structure, the BIA process behind it, and the conditions precedent in plain language. Where the parcel is in trust, the tribe exercises sovereign land-use authority and county zoning does not apply — a fact the study states rather than leaves for the lender to discover. The operating projections are identical either way; what changes is the security package, and the study is explicit about which structure applies and what must close before funding.
Methodology applies the firm's standard category discipline — traffic capture, competitive census, RSMeans budgeting — supplemented by tribal-specific elements: land-status documentation, BIA process mapping, tribal employment and TERO considerations, and component financing where multiple operations share a site. Conditions precedent on land status are stated plainly.
Every Wert-Berater financial model is fully linked with no hardcoded values, so any reviewer can stress any input. Deliverables comprise a complete narrative report and the linked Excel model, with ten-year pro forma, sensitivity analysis at ±5, 10, and 15 percent, interest-rate stress from +0.5 to +3.0 percent, and ratio analysis benchmarked against RMA and IBISWorld data.
SBA engagements are prepared to SOP 50 10 8, including its debt-service-coverage minimums of 1.15x operating and 1.00x global. USDA engagements follow RD Staff Instruction 5001 across the Business & Industry, Community Facilities, REAP, and Value-Added Producer Grant programs — tribes and tribal entities are eligible borrowers under these programs, and the study is built to the program's own feasibility requirements so the file clears agency review the first time. Conventional engagements are built to the lender's stated coverage standard, typically 1.20x. Engagements support conventional, SBA, and USDA lending to tribal enterprises and Section 17 corporations, with the study addressing the collateral and jurisdictional questions reviewing counsel will raise before they raise them.
Beyond program compliance, the study analyzes the capital structure itself from the lender's side of the table: the tribal equity contribution and its source, the loan-to-value and loan-to-cost position, and debt service coverage at the component level where multiple operations share a site — so each revenue stream is shown to carry its own weight, not just the blended total. Where the sovereign tax framework strengthens cash flow, the analysis separates that advantage from underlying operating economics through the taxable-parity test, giving the credit committee a clean view of how much coverage comes from operations and how much from the tax position. The result is an equity and debt analysis a lender can take to committee without reworking it.
The firm's tribal work spans the full range of enterprise and land-based projects: casinos and gaming facilities, hotels, sports facilities, medical facilities, retail projects, gas stations and travel centers, land-development highest-and-best-use analyses, and leased-fee projects — completed for various tribes across the country. Each engagement carries the same sovereign legal, land-status, and tax analysis described above, applied to the economics of its own asset class.
The reference engagement is a $3,969,648 highway travel center with retail strip for a tribal Section 17 corporation in Nevada, completed in 2026 and determined feasible across all five dimensions required under SBA SOP 50 10 8. The capital structure was a conventional loan of $2,977,236 at 75 percent loan-to-value against tribal equity of $992,412, and the study carried the sovereign tax framework in the base case with component-level DSCR analysis. The combined Year-1 debt service coverage was 3.87x against a 1.25x minimum — and the taxable-parity test showed 3.06x even on a fully-taxable basis, so the feasibility determination never depended on the tax advantage. Independence is non-negotiable: determinations follow the evidence and are not revised under pressure, and studies are built to pass lender, agency, and third-party review without exception items.
Qualify a project. Tell us about the project and the program. We will tell you the truth about it — scope, timeline, and fee confirmed before work begins.
Schedule a Zoom Call →