The Rural Energy for America Program funds renewable energy systems and energy efficiency improvements for agricultural producers and rural small businesses. It awards both grants and guaranteed loans, and the two can be combined. The figures below are from 7 CFR part 4280 subpart B; the programme can vary them through a Federal Register notice, so confirm the current notice before you rely on an amount.
| Cost share | Grant funds will not exceed 25 percent of eligible project costs. |
|---|---|
| Minimum request | $2,500 for a renewable energy system (RES); $1,500 for an energy efficiency improvement (EEI). |
| Maximum request | $500,000 for a RES project; $250,000 for an EEI project. |
| Annual ceiling | Grant assistance to one person or entity will not exceed $750,000 per Federal fiscal year. |
| With a guaranteed loan | Combined grant and guaranteed loan may not exceed 75 percent of eligible project costs, with the grant portion capped at 25 percent. The minimum guaranteed loan request is $5,000 (7 CFR 4280.137). |
Each of those figures applies “unless otherwise specified in a Federal Register notice” — the rule builds in the Agency’s ability to change them for a funding round.
Eligible projects fall into two families: renewable energy systems (solar, wind, anaerobic digesters and biogas, geothermal, hydropower, biomass and hydrogen among them) and energy efficiency improvements to an existing operation.
REAP is a technically scored programme, and the technical documentation is where applications most often fall down.
Applications are scored on environmental benefits, energy generated, replaced or saved, commitment of funds, whether the applicant is a previous grantee or borrower, whether the business already exists, simple payback, the size of the request, and State Director and Administrator priority points.
Two failure modes recur. The first is a payback calculation that assumes savings the equipment cannot deliver at the site’s actual load profile. The second is a revenue projection for a renewable system — particularly a digester or a biomass facility — that assumes feedstock supply and offtake pricing without contracts or comparable evidence. Both are analysis problems, and both are what an independent feasibility study is for.
Last reviewed September 2026. Figures are quoted from the current text of 7 CFR part 4280 subpart B.
Feasibility and market analysis for renewable energy and efficiency projects. Fixed fee quoted in one business day.
Schedule a Qualification Zoom All USDA grantsLegal disclosure. Wert-Berater, Inc. offices are mailing addresses only. Following the COVID-19 pandemic the firm has elected to work remotely; its office locations receive mail and are not staffed for visitors or in-person meetings. Headquarters mailing address: 1968 South Coast Hwy, Ste 2382, Laguna Beach, CA 92651.
Wert-Berater, Inc. is an independent provider of feasibility studies and other related services. The firm does not provide financing or equity investment advice, and does not arrange, broker, or place debt or equity capital of any kind.
All appraisal assignments are performed by Bruce E. Jones, MAI, ASA-GC, BCA, CMEA, a member of the Appraisal Institute since 2006, a staff member of Wert-Berater, Inc. and owner of Special Purpose Realty Valuation.