Grant and incentive programs do not fund good intentions — they fund applications that prove eligibility and viability on the program’s own terms. That proof is a feasibility analysis built to the agency’s scoring criteria.
Each grant and incentive program scores applications against specific viability and impact tests, and a generic study does not address them. The firm prepares the analysis the program actually requires — energy savings and payback for USDA REAP, value-added economics and market expansion for Value-Added Producer Grants, essential-community-need and financial sustainability for Community Facilities, and the job-creation and economic-impact evidence behind state and local incentive awards. Where multiple sources of capital stack — a grant atop a guaranteed loan atop a tax credit — the firm models the combined structure and demonstrates viability with and without each layer, so the awarding agency and the lender each see the case addressed to their own standard.
Renewable-energy and efficiency feasibility to the program’s technical and financial criteria: energy and dollar savings, simple payback, and the project economics REAP scoring rewards.
The market expansion and value-added economics VAPG requires — demonstrated demand for the value-added product, margin analysis, and the viability narrative the application must carry.
Essential-need documentation, demographic and demand evidence, and financial-sustainability analysis for CF financing and for state and local incentive and tax-credit applications.
Where grants, guaranteed loans, and credits combine, the firm models the full stack and demonstrates viability layer by layer — addressed to every awarding body in the file.
Fixed fees quoted in advance, scoped to the program and the number of capital sources analyzed. Pairs with the firm’s full feasibility studies where a program requires both an application package and a lender-grade study, and with monitoring where an award carries ongoing performance reporting.