Wert-Berater, Inc. — Independent Feasibility Study Consultants
← Back to Services
Independent Feasibility Studies · Clean Energy

Geothermal Energy Feasibility Studies

Prepared for lenders, CDCs, and federal agencies to SBA SOP 50 10 8, USDA RD Instruction 5001, and conventional underwriting standards. Fiduciary duty runs to the lender and the agency, never the borrower. More than 4,000 studies since 1998 covering $40.2 billion in evaluated project value.

Geothermal Energy Feasibility Study
Geothermal Energy Feasibility Studies

The Feasibility Question

Geothermal feasibility is resource risk first: the temperature and flow evidence behind the resource, drilling cost and success-rate assumptions, PPA or direct-use offtake, and the firm-power premium the technology can command. Ground-source heating projects are evaluated on installed-cost payback against conventional systems for the specific building load.

Methodology

The analysis reviews resource assessments independently, drilling and completion cost benchmarks, offtake terms, and operating data from comparable plants. Coverage is tested with resource-performance sensitivity stated plainly.

Every Wert-Berater financial model is fully linked with no hardcoded values, so any reviewer can stress any input. Deliverables comprise a complete narrative report and the linked Excel model, with ten-year pro forma, sensitivity analysis at ±5, 10, and 15 percent, interest-rate stress from +0.5 to +3.0 percent, and ratio analysis benchmarked against RMA and IBISWorld data.

Lending Compliance

SBA engagements are prepared to SOP 50 10 8, including its debt-service-coverage minimums of 1.15x operating and 1.00x global. USDA engagements follow RD Staff Instruction 5001 across the Business & Industry, Community Facilities, REAP, and Value-Added Producer Grant programs. Conventional engagements are built to the lender's stated coverage standard, typically 1.20x. Clean-energy engagements are prepared to USDA RD Instruction 5001 where REAP and B&I apply — including the energy-production documentation, incentive analysis, and payback arithmetic REAP requires — and to conventional and institutional standards otherwise, with interconnection and incentive risk addressed directly rather than assumed away.

Experience

Representative clean-energy work includes a $52,688,000 green carbon project evaluation and renewable-energy feasibility within the firm's USDA REAP and B&I practice. Independence is non-negotiable: determinations follow the evidence and are not revised under pressure, and studies are built to pass lender, agency, and third-party review without exception items.

Qualify a project. Tell us about the project and the program. We will tell you the truth about it — scope, timeline, and fee confirmed before work begins.

Schedule a Zoom Call →
Related project types
Solar Farm & Commercial Solar Wind Energy Battery Energy Storage Hydrogen Production & Fueling Renewable Natural Gas & Digesters Biofuels & Renewable Fuels
More
Full project-type index Wert-Berater main site
← Back to Services