Growth slowed, prices stayed elevated, construction spending fell and business formation kept running well ahead of the number of firms that actually reach payroll. This guide connects the 2026 data to the questions a lender asks — and to what an independent feasibility study has to test before a credit committee will rely on a projection.
A business feasibility study is an independent evaluation of whether a proposed business or project has a reasonable expectation of success. It tests market demand, pricing, competition, technical delivery, capital structure, operating costs and the ability to service debt, and it reaches a conclusion the sponsor did not write. Lenders and agencies rely on it because the analyst has no stake in the answer — and because it must be capable of concluding that a project is not feasible.
Credit committees do not read the economy as a mood. They read it as a small number of series that bear on whether a projection will hold. Through mid-2026 those series describe moderate growth alongside price pressure that has not fully receded.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported real gross domestic product growth of 1.5% in the second quarter of 2026, following 2.1% in the first quarter. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 162,000 nonfarm payroll jobs added in August 2026, with unemployment at 4.1%. On prices, the Consumer Price Index stood 3.4% higher year over year in July 2026. The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported the personal consumption expenditures price index at 3.7% for the same period, with core PCE at 3.3%.
Read together, that is an economy still expanding but decelerating, with a labour market adding jobs at a moderate pace and inflation above the levels that prevailed before the last cycle. For a project that will not open its doors for another eighteen months, the operative consequence is not today's index level. It is whether the revenue ramp, the wage line and the construction budget in the model were built with escalation to the actual opening date, or with today's costs held flat.
Direct answer: the Census Bureau reported 578,926 business applications in July 2026, roughly 8.1% above June. Projected business formations with payroll arising from that cohort were far smaller, at approximately 29,959. Both numbers are real, and the distance between them is the single most useful thing in the series for anyone underwriting a start-up.
An application is an intention. A payroll business is an operating enterprise with employees, a premises, a cost base and customers. Lenders underwrite the second. When a sponsor cites formation statistics as evidence of market momentum, the relevant follow-up is how many of those entities reached payroll in the same trade area, and how many were still operating three years later.
This is also why an independent study treats a founder's enthusiasm as an input rather than as evidence. The question is not whether people are starting businesses of this type. It is whether this business, in this location, at this cost, can generate the revenue assumed.
Direct answer: Census Bureau figures put total construction spending at roughly $2.158 trillion at a seasonally adjusted annual rate in July 2026, about 0.5% below June and 3.8% below a year earlier. Housing starts fell 12.4% from June and 13.5% year over year in July, while permits rose. A softer aggregate does not translate into a softer price for a specific trade in a specific market.
National construction aggregates are a poor proxy for what a particular project will cost. They mix residential and non-residential, public and private, and every region. A decline in total spending can coexist with a shortage of a specialised trade in one metropolitan area, and permits rising while starts fall points to projects being authorised but not broken ground — often a financing or cost signal rather than a demand signal.
For a feasibility study the useful work is at project level: comparable recent bids for similar facilities in the same market, contingency sized against the actual scope definition, escalation carried to the real completion date, and an explicit view on who bears cost risk under the contracting structure chosen. Our guide to construction lending under USDA B&I and SBA covers the financing mechanics that sit alongside this.
Direct answer: a business plan is management's statement of intent, written to be persuasive. A feasibility study is prepared by an independent party and must be able to conclude that the project is not feasible. That difference in authorship of the conclusion is the whole reason a credit committee treats the two documents differently.
Both documents may contain the same projections. Only one of them has tested those projections against evidence the sponsor did not supply. A study that simply reformats management's spreadsheet into a longer document has not done the work, whatever it is called on the cover.
A complete study addresses six areas. USDA's guaranteed lending framework organises feasibility around economic, market, technical, financial and management dimensions; sensitivity analysis is the discipline that ties them together by asking what happens when the assumptions underperform.
Trade-area definition, population and demographic trends, the existing competitive set and announced supply, achievable pricing, capture rate and the ramp to stabilisation. The central question is whether the revenue line can be reconstructed from market evidence, rather than accepted because management proposed it. Where a capture rate is assumed, the study should say what share of the trade area it implies and whether comparable operators achieve it.
Whether the facility, process or technology can deliver the throughput the projections assume; site suitability, utilities and access; the construction budget tested against comparable projects; contingency; escalation to completion; and the schedule, including what a delay costs. Interest during construction and the working capital needed between completion and stabilised operations belong here too, and are among the most commonly understated items in a sponsor's model.
The full capital stack, equity contribution and its source, leverage, amortisation, operating cost build-up, break-even, working-capital requirements, capital expenditure reserves and refinancing risk. USDA frames financial feasibility in terms of whether the business can generate sufficient income, credit and cash flow to sustain operations and meet its debt obligations, which is a useful formulation because it puts debt service inside the definition rather than beside it.
Whether the people running the project have operated a comparable business at comparable scale, the depth of the team beyond the principal, key-person exposure, and whether the staffing plan and wage assumptions match the local labour market. A strong market and a sound building do not rescue an operator who has not run this type of facility before.
How the project sits within its regional economy: employment base, industry concentration, income trends, population movement and the exposure of local demand to a single employer or sector. This is where the national figures earlier on this page become relevant — not as headline colour, but as the backdrop against which a specific trade area's trajectory is judged.
What happens when revenue arrives later or lower, when construction runs over, when a key cost inflates, or when a competitor opens. A study without sensitivity analysis has told the lender what happens if everything goes to plan, which is the one scenario the lender is least worried about.
Coverage is where these areas converge. The arithmetic below is deliberately simple, and it is an illustrative example only — it is not a quotation, a benchmark, or a statement of any real project's results.
| Line | Base case | Revenue 10% below plan |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5,000,000 | $4,500,000 |
| Operating expense (largely fixed) | $3,500,000 | $3,500,000 |
| Cash flow available for debt service | $1,500,000 | $1,000,000 |
| Annual debt service | $1,000,000 | $1,000,000 |
| Debt-service coverage ratio | 1.50x | 1.00x |
A base case at 1.50x looks comfortable. A revenue shortfall of one tenth — entirely ordinary in a first year of operations — consumes the whole cushion and leaves the project generating exactly its debt service and nothing more. If roughly 30% of that operating expense were genuinely variable with revenue, coverage in the downside would land near 1.11x instead of 1.00x, which is why the fixed-versus-variable split deserves scrutiny rather than a single blended assumption.
The point is not the specific numbers. It is that coverage stated only at the base case tells a credit committee very little, and that the cost structure determines how much of a miss a project can absorb. For how coverage expectations differ across programmes, see DSCR requirements compared: SBA, USDA and conventional.
Not every transaction carries the same evidentiary burden. The pattern below reflects where repayment depends most heavily on projection rather than on operating history.
| Project type | Principal risk | Where evidence is thinnest | Typical depth of analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expansion of an established operating business | Incremental demand | Whether new capacity is absorbed | Focused market and financial review |
| Business acquisition | Sustainability of seller earnings | Post-transfer customer and staff retention | Quality of earnings plus market testing |
| Ground-up construction, known asset class | Cost and schedule | Budget, escalation, interest during construction | Full study with construction review |
| Start-up with no operating history | Revenue ramp | Capture rate and time to stabilisation | Full study with primary research |
| Hospitality and lodging | Occupancy and rate | Competitive supply pipeline | Full study with demand segmentation |
| Healthcare, senior living, specialised facilities | Utilisation and reimbursement | Referral base and payer mix | Full study with sector-specific analysis |
| Processing, manufacturing, technically complex plant | Throughput and offtake | Technical capacity and contracted demand | Full study with technical coordination |
General patterns in how transaction risk drives analytical depth. Requirements for any specific loan are set by the lender and, where applicable, the agency.
Direct answer: SBA does not universally require a feasibility study. SBA lenders independently underwrite repayment ability, management, cash flow, acquisition economics, collateral where applicable and project risk. For start-ups, acquisitions, construction, hotels, new-market expansions and unusually complex transactions, a lender or CDC may seek independent market or financial analysis depending on the transaction.
On sizing, the 7(a) programme is generally capped at $5 million for an individual loan. Separate policy has addressed combined 7(a) and 504 exposure at a higher figure — a different limit that is regularly confused with the individual ceiling, and one worth confirming with your lender before the capital stack is modelled. The current position is set out in our note on the combined 7(a)/504 limit, alongside the FY 2027 fee schedules and our SBA policy round-up. For the underwriting standard itself, see SBA feasibility study requirements.
Direct answer: USDA's guaranteed lending framework contemplates a feasibility study prepared by an independent qualified consultant in defined circumstances, and it addresses economic, market, technical, financial and management feasibility. USDA announced an increase in the guarantee percentage from 80% to 85% for qualifying Business & Industry loans under $5 million in fiscal year 2026.
A higher guarantee changes how much loss exposure the lender retains. It does not change whether the projections are supportable, and it does not lower the evidentiary bar for a project whose repayment depends on a forecast. If anything, a more attractive guarantee makes the independent analysis more important rather than less, because more marginal transactions become worth a lender's time. The programme detail is covered in our USDA B&I and OneRD guide and the B&I feasibility study requirements. The 7 CFR Part 5001 feasibility study page provides the national service framework.
Send the project type, the market and the approximate total project cost. You will receive a written scope, a delivery date and a fixed fee, quoted before work begins and never contingent on the conclusion or on financing being approved.
Request a Fixed-Fee QuoteThe value of a study depends on who performed it. Relevant education, relevant experience, verifiable credentials, independence and a methodology that genuinely tests management's assumptions matter more than the length of the report. Ask who will perform the analysis, who will sign it, how many comparable assignments they have completed, and whether any part of the fee depends on the outcome.
Where a designation such as MAI is claimed, verify it through the Appraisal Institute rather than a biography — the designation involves advanced education, a comprehensive examination, a demonstration-of-knowledge requirement and 4,500 hours of specialised experience. Where securities-industry experience is claimed, FINRA's BrokerCheck may carry registration history. Our companion guide, feasibility study consultant credentials, sets out the verification steps in full.
One further caution on how consultants are found. The Federal Trade Commission has warned that scammers use search-engine advertising to impersonate legitimate businesses and government programmes. Confirm the domain, verify the entity independently, and treat any promise of guaranteed approval or a guaranteed favourable finding as disqualifying.
An independent evaluation of whether a proposed business or project has a reasonable expectation of success. It tests market demand, pricing, competition, technical delivery, capital structure, operating costs and the ability to service debt, and it reaches a conclusion the sponsor did not write. A business plan sets out what management intends to do; a feasibility study tests whether the intention is supportable.
Not universally. SBA lenders underwrite repayment ability, management, cash flow, acquisition economics, collateral where applicable and project risk. For start-ups, business acquisitions, construction projects, hotels and new-market expansions, a lender or CDC may request independent market or feasibility analysis based on the transaction. Treat it as an underwriting and risk-management resource rather than a blanket programme requirement, and confirm what your lender expects.
USDA's guaranteed lending framework contemplates a feasibility study by an independent qualified consultant in defined circumstances, addressing economic, market, technical, financial and management feasibility. Whether one is required for a particular application depends on the programme, the loan purpose and the assessment made by the lender and the agency. Confirm with the lender and the USDA Rural Development state office before commissioning work.
Federal data through mid-2026 describe moderate growth with persistent price pressure. The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported real GDP growth of 1.5% in the second quarter of 2026 after 2.1% in the first. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 162,000 nonfarm payroll jobs added in August 2026 with unemployment at 4.1%. CPI ran 3.4% higher year over year in July 2026.
It is affecting them through cost escalation and the discount rate applied to future cash flow. CPI was reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 3.4% higher year over year in July 2026, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported the PCE price index at 3.7% with core PCE at 3.3%. For a project that will not open for eighteen months, the relevant question is not the current index level but whether the construction budget and the operating cost assumptions carry escalation to the actual opening date.
Yes, at a substantial rate. The Census Bureau reported 578,926 business applications in July 2026, about 8.1% above June. Projected business formations with payroll from that cohort were far smaller, at roughly 29,959. The gap is the practical point: an application is an intention, while a payroll business is an operating enterprise, and lenders underwrite the second.
Census Bureau data put total construction spending at roughly $2.158 trillion at a seasonally adjusted annual rate in July 2026, about 0.5% below June and 3.8% below a year earlier. Housing starts fell 12.4% from June and 13.5% year over year in July, while permits rose. Softening activity does not automatically mean softening prices for a specific trade in a specific market.
The construction budget against comparable recent projects rather than against a national index, the contingency and who controls it, the contracting structure and where cost risk sits, the schedule and the consequences of delay, escalation to the actual completion date, interest during construction, and the working capital required between completion and stabilised operations. A budget that is only current at signing is not a tested budget.
Debt-service coverage ratio is cash flow available for debt service divided by required debt service. A ratio of 1.25x means the project generates 1.25 dollars for every dollar of debt payment. Expectations vary by programme, asset type, lender and risk profile, so there is no single universal threshold. What matters as much as the base ratio is how much coverage survives a realistic downside.
More than most sponsors expect, because operating costs do not fall in step with revenue. On an illustrative project with $5.0 million of revenue, $3.5 million of operating expense and $1.0 million of annual debt service, base coverage is 1.50x. If revenue comes in 10% below plan and costs are largely fixed, coverage falls to about 1.00x. The cushion is consumed by a single-digit percentage miss.
Authorship of the conclusion. A business plan is management's statement of intent and is written to be persuasive. A feasibility study is prepared by an independent party and must be capable of concluding that the project is not feasible. Lenders and agencies rely on the second precisely because the analyst has no stake in the answer.
The 7(a) programme is generally capped at $5 million for an individual loan. Separate policy has addressed combined 7(a) and 504 exposure at a higher figure, which is a different limit and is frequently confused with the individual ceiling. Confirm both the individual and combined limits that apply to your structure with your lender before modelling the capital stack.
USDA announced an increase in the guarantee percentage from 80% to 85% for qualifying Business & Industry loans under $5 million in fiscal year 2026. A higher guarantee changes the lender's loss exposure. It does not change whether the project's projections are supportable, which remains the question a feasibility study is commissioned to answer.
It depends on scope, data availability and how much primary research the market requires. What determines the timeline more than anything is whether site, cost and operating information is available at the outset. Ask for a written delivery date alongside the fee, and ask what information the consultant needs from you in order to hold that date.
Ask for exact degree titles, awarding institutions and years, then confirm them with the institution. Where a designation such as MAI is claimed, check the Appraisal Institute directory rather than a biography. Where securities-industry experience is claimed, FINRA's BrokerCheck may hold registration history. Our guide to feasibility study consultant credentials covers the verification steps in detail.
Be cautious about impersonation generally. The Federal Trade Commission has warned that scammers use search-engine advertising to impersonate legitimate businesses and government programmes. Confirm you are dealing with the firm you intended: check the domain, verify the entity and its address independently, and be wary of any party offering guaranteed approval or a guaranteed favourable finding.
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Census Bureau Business Formation Statistics and Construction Spending; 7 CFR Part 5001 (USDA OneRD Guarantee Loan Initiative); U.S. Small Business Administration programme materials; Appraisal Institute; FINRA BrokerCheck; Federal Trade Commission consumer guidance on search-advertising impersonation. Published September 6, 2026.
President, Wert-Berater, Inc. — independent feasibility study consultants since 1998. 4,000+ engagements completed across all 50 states and internationally, evaluating $41.2 billion in project value for SBA, USDA, EB-5, conventional, and institutional financing decisions. Fiduciary duty runs to the lender and agency in every engagement.
Schedule a ConversationIndependent feasibility studies since 1998 — 4,000+ engagements, $41.2 billion in evaluated project value. Standard delivery 10–15 business days; RUSH delivery available at additional cost. Fixed fee, quoted before any work begins, never contingent on the finding.
Legal disclosure. Wert-Berater, Inc. offices are mailing addresses only. Following the COVID-19 pandemic the firm has elected to work remotely; its office locations receive mail and are not staffed for visitors or in-person meetings. Headquarters mailing address: 1968 South Coast Hwy, Ste 2382, Laguna Beach, CA 92651.
Wert-Berater, Inc. is an independent provider of feasibility studies and other related services. The firm does not provide financing or equity investment advice, and does not arrange, broker, or place debt or equity capital of any kind.
All appraisal assignments are performed by Bruce E. Jones, MAI, ASA-GC, BCA, CMEA, a member of the Appraisal Institute since 2006, a staff member of Wert-Berater, Inc. and owner of Special Purpose Realty Valuation.