Feasibility studies, market studies, business plans and fully linked financial models prepared to address the information EXIM requires under the Make More in America Initiative and limited-recourse project finance. Independent, never contingent on the finding, and written to be read by a credit officer.
Wert-Berater, Inc. prepares the independent feasibility study, market study, business plan and linked financial model that a U.S. manufacturer or project sponsor submits in support of an application to the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM). We are engaged by manufacturers building or expanding export-oriented plants under the Make More in America Initiative, by sponsors of greenfield and brownfield projects applying through EXIM's Structured and Project Finance Division under Attachment F (Form EIB 95-10f), and by the commercial banks, advisers and law firms structuring those transactions. The work product is a bound narrative report, a fully linked Excel model with no hardcoded values, a documented market and demand analysis, a capital and operating cost review, debt-service and downside sensitivity analysis, a risk register, and an implementation schedule. Fiduciary duty runs to the lender and the reviewing agency, never to the borrower. Our conclusions are not revised under pressure, and no fee of ours is contingent on a favorable finding.
That distinction matters, and it is the reason a generic business plan is usually rejected on the first pass. EXIM's project finance approach is explicit that projects are subject to extensive underwriting typical of a large project financing spanning technical, environmental, market, financial, legal and insurance due diligence. The Division has operated since 1993 and has supported more than 83 projects across 36 countries. Applications arrive already carrying the sponsor's own consultants' work; EXIM then engages its own independent engineers, market consultant, insurance advisers and outside legal counsel, at the sponsor's cost, to test that work.
The practical consequence for a sponsor is simple. Your feasibility study will be read adversarially by professionals hired specifically to find the hole in it. It should be built to survive that reading — sourced, reconcilable, and honest about the downside — rather than written to persuade.
EXIM operates two families of transaction that generate feasibility-study work:
A third dimension cuts across both: whether the transaction is underwritten on the balance sheet of an existing corporate borrower or as limited-recourse project finance dependent on the project's own future cash flow. That choice determines which attachment governs the filing, how much engineering must exist before you apply, and how deep the feasibility analysis must go. It is worth settling before anyone starts drafting. See EXIM project finance feasibility studies for the criteria EXIM applies to limited-recourse structures.
An EXIM-directed engagement at Wert-Berater produces the following. Each element exists because a reviewer will ask for it, and each is prepared so it can be traced back to a source.
The table below maps what EXIM's published guidance and application attachments call for, to the deliverable that answers it, the evidence base behind that deliverable, and the professional responsible for it. Items marked sponsor or third party are not ours to produce; we identify them, reconcile to them, and flag them when they are missing.
| EXIM requirement | Wert-Berater deliverable | Evidence / source | Responsible professional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed feasibility study before application (project finance) | Independent feasibility report with express determination | Primary market research, industry production and pricing data, comparable facility benchmarks | Wert-Berater — lead analyst, reviewed by the President |
| Solid, well-conceived business plan | Business plan and commercialization strategy | Sponsor operating history, management interviews, customer pipeline documentation | Wert-Berater with sponsor management |
| Reliability of future cash flows to repay project debt | Fully linked financial model, debt-service analysis, downside sensitivity | Contracted and modeled revenue, input cost curves, RMA and industry operating benchmarks | Wert-Berater — financial modeling |
| Sensitivity analysis producing sufficient debt-service coverage across the term | Sensitivity suite and breakeven analysis at the coverage floor | Model-driven; price, volume, cost and rate stress cases | Wert-Berater — financial modeling |
| Export nexus (MMIA): 15% or 25% of output exported or expected to be exported | Export-market analysis and documented nexus calculation | Purchase orders, letters of intent, distributor agreements, destination-market demand analysis | Wert-Berater, evidenced by sponsor contracts |
| Jobs supported during construction and over the financing term (MMIA sizing) | Employment schedule by phase and job-year computation | Staffing plan, BLS occupational wage data, construction labor schedule | Wert-Berater — economic analysis |
| Total project cost comparable to similar projects | CAPEX benchmarking against comparable facilities | Equipment quotations, EPC pricing, location-adjusted construction cost data | Wert-Berater, reconciled to the engineer's estimate |
| Front-end engineering and design (FEED) | Not ours — reconciled to, and gaps flagged | Sponsor's engineering package | Independent engineer / EPC contractor |
| Approved Environmental and Social Impact Assessment; Environmental Screening Document (Attachment B) | Not ours — schedule and cost impact carried into the model | ESIA, permits, agency correspondence | Environmental consultant |
| Long-term offtake and input contracts from creditworthy counterparties | Offtake and supply analysis, counterparty credit commentary, contract-coverage schedule | Executed contracts, LOIs, counterparty financials and public ratings | Wert-Berater, with sponsor's counsel on enforceability |
| Equity arrangements completed prior to application | Sources-and-uses and finance plan reflecting committed equity | Equity commitment letters, sponsor balance sheets | Sponsor and its financial adviser; carried in our model |
| Preliminary information memorandum (PIM) | Study content structured so the PIM can draw from it directly | The feasibility study and model | Sponsor / financial adviser, supported by Wert-Berater |
| Reasonable assurance of repayment (non-project finance): three-year revenue history, proven debt-service capacity, loan proportionate to the company | Historical financial analysis and global debt-service capacity | Audited or reviewed financial statements, tax returns, existing debt schedule | Wert-Berater — credit analysis |
| Economic impact and additionality review | Economic impact analysis and market-displacement commentary | EXIM Economic Impact Procedures (February 2025), industry capacity data | Wert-Berater — economic analysis |
| U.S. content documentation (foreign-buyer transactions) | Not ours — content assumptions carried into the cost model | Exporter's Certificate, supplier bills of material | Exporter / sponsor |
Requirements column summarized from EXIM published guidance: Guidelines for Submitting a Successful Project Finance Application, Our Approach to Project Finance, Make More in America Initiative, Application for Long-Term Loan or Guarantee (EIB 95-10) and its attachments, and Economic Impact Procedures. EXIM requirements change; confirm current guidance with EXIM or your lender before relying on any summary, including this one.
MMIA exists because U.S. manufacturers in sectors critical to national security — small and mid-sized firms in particular — struggle to finance the domestic capacity they need to compete for global sales. EXIM assesses project eligibility against its standard due diligence and additionality requirements plus two core criteria:
Eligibility turns on the percentage of production or shipments tied to exports. The required nexus is 15 percent for small businesses, transformational export areas and climate-related transactions, and 25 percent of output exported or expected to be exported for projects in other sectors. Export suppliers can qualify as well where the nexus standards are met. In our experience the phrase that carries the analytical weight is expected to be exported: a projection is acceptable, but it has to be an evidenced projection. That is a feasibility-study question, and it is where a thin application fails.
The amount of EXIM financing available to an individual project is scaled to the number of U.S. jobs supported, during construction and over the life of the financing. Each job-year — one job over five years being five job-years — allows for up to $229,502 in financing. For domestic transactions this standard replaces the U.S. content requirement that governs traditional foreign-buyer deals. The practical effect is that your staffing plan and construction labor schedule are not administrative detail; they size the loan.
Separately, for non-project-finance transactions EXIM generally requires a minimum three-year revenue-producing history in the same line of business, proven debt-service capacity, and a loan amount not disproportionate to the size of the company — generally not more than 40 percent of the borrower's tangible net worth. Project finance transactions are assessed under EXIM's project finance approach instead. Read the detail on the MMIA feasibility study page.
This is the most common misunderstanding we correct in a first call. EXIM retains independent outside legal counsel, independent engineers, insurance advisers and a market consultant to conduct its own due diligence, and those fees are borne by the project sponsors. Sponsors sometimes conclude from this that they need not commission their own analysis, since EXIM will do it anyway.
The sequence runs the other way. EXIM's Structured and Project Finance Division reviews a submitted application within five to ten business days simply to determine whether it contains enough information to proceed to evaluation. An application judged incomplete is returned with an explanation of its deficiencies. The sponsor's feasibility study, FEED, ESIA and finance plan are the material that gets you past that gate and into evaluation — and then it is that material EXIM's consultants test. Arriving without it does not save money; it costs a cycle.
Where the project has merit, EXIM may issue a Preliminary Project Letter indicating it is prepared to proceed with additional due diligence, generally within 45 days of the commencement of the evaluation, with an indicative financing offer attached. Everything downstream of that letter is negotiation over terms that were set by the quality of the information available at application.
Wert-Berater has prepared more than 4,000 feasibility studies since 1998, covering $40.2 billion in evaluated project value across all 50 states. The methodology does not change by program: primary market research, industry production and pricing data, location-adjusted facility cost data, BLS occupational wage data for the staffing model, and RMA and industry operating benchmarks for the ratio analysis. Every model is fully linked with no hardcoded values, so any reviewer can stress any input and watch the coverage move. Sensitivity runs at plus and minus 5, 10 and 15 percent, with interest-rate stress from +0.5 to +3.0 percent.
Independence is the product. Our engagement letter fixes scope, timeline and fee before work begins, and the fee is never contingent on the conclusion. If the numbers do not support the project, the report says so — which is precisely why a lender or an agency reviewer can rely on it.
We want to be exact about this, because export finance rewards precision and penalizes overstatement. Wert-Berater has not to date completed an engagement financed by EXIM, and we make no claim that EXIM has approved, accepted or reviewed our work. What we bring is directly adjacent and verifiable:
Our studies are prepared to address EXIM's published requirements. Whether a given application succeeds is EXIM's determination, not ours, and no consultant can promise otherwise.
There is no EXIM roster of approved feasibility consultants to be listed on. What a reviewer weighs is whether the author is genuinely independent, whether the methodology is disclosed, whether assumptions are sourced, and whether the model can be stressed. A study authored by the sponsor's own staff, or by a firm compensated on closing, carries little weight in that reading.
We confirm scope, timeline and a fixed fee in writing before work begins, and we will tell you in the first call if the project is not ready for an application. See what drives feasibility study cost.
Tell us the product, the plant, the destination markets and the financing structure you are contemplating. We will tell you whether an EXIM application is realistic, what evidence you are missing, and what the study will cost — before you commit to anything.
Qualify an EXIM project. Scope, timeline and fee confirmed in writing before work begins. Independent findings, never contingent on the outcome.
Schedule a Zoom Call →