A completed municipal hotel feasibility assessment in Belle Glade, Florida, received a FAVORABLE WITH CONDITIONS determination. The analysis found lodging demand, while an unsubsidized new build did not meet the required equity return; a public-capital path and an existing-property conversion remain conditional alternatives.
Wert-Berater completed an independent municipal hotel feasibility assessment for Belle Glade, Florida. The assignment examined lodging demand, local operating conditions, development feasibility, financial supportability, management considerations, public-benefit implications, and implementation conditions. The determination was FAVORABLE WITH CONDITIONS: the evidence supports a lodging opportunity, but the conditions identified in the assessment must be resolved before any development decision can reasonably proceed.
The completed deliverable includes a 174-page report, a 62-worksheet financial model, and an interactive research presentation. The work brought together multiple demand approaches, operating benchmarks, sensitivity analysis, debt-service testing, alternative transaction structures, and an explicit limitations register. It is an assessment of a proposed hotel opportunity, not a commitment to build, lend, subsidize, operate, or approve a hotel.
The market evidence indicates that lodging demand exists in Belle Glade. The analysis also found that an unsubsidized new build would not meet the required equity return at the modeled development economics. A new-build path can therefore be considered only conditionally, with public capital and other prerequisites subject to separate municipal, lender, and counterparty decisions. An existing-property conversion may offer a different path without the same public-capital requirement, but only if a suitable property can actually be identified, acquired, and approved for the intended use.
The study does not imply construction approval, a loan commitment, a subsidy award, or an affiliation approval. SBA and USDA lending concepts were modeled alternatives within the financial analysis; this engagement was a municipal hotel assessment, not an SBA or USDA lending approval. No public funding package, tax recovery, equity return, or other dollar outcome is represented here. The proposed development value is not disclosed in this public case study.
This completed engagement was a focused hotel assessment. It was not a broad highest-and-best-use appraisal or a completed comparison of every alternative land use. The analysis identified an existing-property conversion as a conditional hotel alternative, but it did not adjudicate a parcel-specific highest and best use. Municipalities seeking a broader comparison can scope an expanded alternative-use assessment that evaluates realistic competing uses, phased development, and no-build scenarios alongside hotel feasibility.
As with any date-specific feasibility work, the evidence should be refreshed before reliance. Control of a suitable property, market verification, construction pricing, financing terms, operating responsibility, and other conditions remain matters for later diligence. The report is not an appraisal, legal opinion, engineering or environmental review, investment recommendation, financing commitment, subsidy guarantee, or approval by a lender, agency, or hotel affiliation.
Municipal clients can review the municipal hotel feasibility and alternative-use assessment service or the general hotel and motel feasibility study service for a separately scoped engagement.
It means the market evidence supports continued consideration of lodging, while identified conditions remain unresolved. It is not an unconditional recommendation or permission to proceed; the municipality and other decision-makers must verify the conditions and choose whether to advance the opportunity.
No. The assessment was completed as decision support. It did not authorize construction, provide a loan, award a subsidy, or grant affiliation approval. SBA and USDA concepts were modeled financing alternatives only, and any future approvals would require separate parties and processes.
No. The completed engagement was a focused municipal hotel assessment and did not adjudicate every possible land use or provide a parcel-specific highest-and-best-use appraisal. A new service can be scoped for an expanded hotel-versus-alternatives comparison, including realistic competing uses and no-build scenarios.
President, Wert-Berater, Inc. — independent feasibility study consultants since 1998. 4,000+ engagements completed across all 50 states and internationally, evaluating $41.2 billion in project value for SBA, USDA, EB-5, conventional, and institutional financing decisions. Fiduciary duty runs to the lender and agency in every engagement.
+1 310-857-2443 ext. 800 · email · 1968 South Coast Hwy, Ste 2382, Laguna Beach, CA 92651 · 111 Town Square Pl Ste 1238 PMB 657834, Jersey City, NJ 07310 · 539 W. Commerce St #8486, Dallas, TX 75208 · 66 W Flagler Street, Suite 900, PMB 12704, Miami, FL 33130
Schedule a ConversationIndependent feasibility studies since 1998 — 4,000+ engagements, $41.2 billion in evaluated project value. Standard delivery in 10 to 15 business days. Fiduciary duty to the lender and agency.
Legal disclosure. Wert-Berater, Inc. offices are mailing addresses only. Following the COVID-19 pandemic the firm has elected to work remotely; its office locations receive mail and are not staffed for visitors or in-person meetings. Headquarters mailing address: 1968 South Coast Hwy, Ste 2382, Laguna Beach, CA 92651.
Wert-Berater, Inc. is an independent provider of feasibility studies and other related services. The firm does not provide financing or equity investment advice, and does not arrange, broker, or place debt or equity capital of any kind.
All appraisal assignments are performed by Bruce E. Jones, MAI, ASA-GC, BCA, CMEA, a member of the Appraisal Institute since 2006, a staff member of Wert-Berater, Inc. and owner of Special Purpose Realty Valuation.